The U.S. had nothing to do with the attack on Iran, tonight. If we are attacked in any way, shape or form by Iran, the full strength and might of the U.S. Armed Forces will come down on you at levels never seen before. However, we can easily get a deal done between Iran and Israel, and end this bloody conflict!!!

📈 Market Reaction:

BTC

Before post: $105,505.97

Time after posted
Price & Change
1 min
$105,505.97
+0.0 (+0.00%)
5 min
$105,509.88
+3.91 (+0.00%)
10 min
$105,480.03
-25.940 (-0.02%)

ETH

Before post: $2,532.49

Time after posted
Price & Change
1 min
$2,534.37
+1.88 (+0.07%)
5 min
$2,535.01
+2.52 (+0.10%)
10 min
$2,533.15
+0.660 (+0.03%)

TRUMP

Before post: $10.02

Time after posted
Price & Change
1 min
$10.03
+0.010 (+0.10%)
5 min
$10.04
+0.020 (+0.20%)
10 min
$10.01
-0.010 (-0.10%)

SP500 🇺🇸

Outside trading hours

Dow Jones 🇺🇸

Outside trading hours

CSI300 🇨🇳

Outside trading hours

STOXX50 🇪🇺

Outside trading hours

🤖 AI Thoughts:

Markets yawn at Trump's latest geopolitical cocktail of threats and deal-making optimism. BTC barely moved: flat in the first minute, a microscopic 0.02% dip over 10 minutes, suggesting crypto traders found the post as exciting as watching paint dry. ETH showed slightly more life with a 0.07% initial bump, though it fizzled to a 0.03% gain, proving even ether can’t sustain enthusiasm for mixed messages. TRUMP tokens mirrored the post’s bipolar tone: a fleeting 0.20% rise before giving up half the gains, like a rally at a poorly attended campaign stop. Compared to historical posts, this one landed with the impact of a deflated balloon: past Iran-related volatility saw BTC swings up to 0.23%, while today’s action wouldn’t register on a seismograph. Even the SP500’s typical 0.08% wobble on similar rhetoric looked like a rollercoaster by comparison. Nothing says "market stability" like a threat of unprecedented military force paired with a used-car-salesman pitch for peace. The only thing more predictable than Trump’s post structure is the market’s shrug.

🗃️ Content similarity analysis: