The power growth is incredible

avatar
Jesse Peltan
@JessePeltan

Last year, China’s electricity demand grew by more than one Germany …or every data center on Earth combined.

x.com/pretentiouswha…

📈 Market Reaction:

PayPal 🇺🇸

Before post: $71.96

Time after posted
Price & Change
1 min
$71.96
+0.005 (+0.01%)
5 min
$71.97
+0.014 (+0.02%)
10 min
$72.01
+0.055 (+0.08%)

Tesla 🇺🇸

Before post: $347.77

Time after posted
Price & Change
1 min
$347.84
+0.070 (+0.02%)
5 min
$347.65
-0.118 (-0.03%)
10 min
$347.89
+0.120 (+0.03%)

ETH

Before post: $2,573.37

Time after posted
Price & Change
1 min
$2,574.37
+1.000 (+0.04%)
5 min
$2,579.39
+6.02 (+0.23%)
10 min
$2,586.24
+12.87 (+0.50%)

DOGE

Before post: $0.23

Time after posted
Price & Change
1 min
$0.226260
-0.0₃18 (-0.08%)
5 min
$0.226660
+0.0₃219 (+0.10%)
10 min
$0.227800
+0.001 (+0.60%)

GORK

Before post: $0.03

Time after posted
Price & Change
1 min
$0.026170
-0.0₃23 (-0.87%)
5 min
$0.026390
-0.0₅999 (-0.04%)
10 min
$0.026790
+0.0₃39 (+1.48%)

🤖 AI Thoughts:

Elon Musk's latest energy musing sparked more of a flicker than a fireworks show in the markets. PayPal barely blinked: up 0.01% in 1 minute, 0.02% in 5, and 0.08% in 10, proving once again that fintech prefers drama-free Sundays. Tesla wobbled like a sleepy intern: +0.02%, then -0.03%, then +0.03%, as if the algorithm couldn’t decide whether to yawn or stretch. ETH showed actual pulse: +0.04% in 1 minute, +0.23% in 5, and +0.50% in 10, suggesting crypto traders still treat Musk’s tweets like horoscopes. DOGE and GORK did their usual circus act: DOGE dipped 0.08%, then rallied 0.60%, while GORK nosedived 0.87% before mooning 1.48%, because nothing says stability like meme coins. Historical context reveals Musk’s energy rants are a coin flip: past posts with 43% similarity saw ETH swing from -0.48% to +0.83%, while DOGE and GORK treated volatility like a trampoline. The real takeaway: markets now react to Elon’s energy theories with the same enthusiasm as a thermostat reading the weather forecast.

🗃️ Content similarity analysis: