🎯

avatar
Jesse Peltan
@JessePeltan

We absolutely should invest in nuclear fission, but even quadrupling our fission capacity is tiny compared to the growth already happening in solar. 300 GW of new nuclear over 25 years is 12 GW/year. China built 278 GW of solar - last year. 12 GW of new nuclear every year x.com/energybants/st…

📈 Market Reaction:

ETH

Before post: $2,544.92

Time after posted
Price & Change
1 min
$2,548.49
+3.57 (+0.14%)
5 min
$2,547.00
+2.08 (+0.08%)
10 min
$2,556.13
+11.21 (+0.44%)

DOGE

Before post: $0.24

Time after posted
Price & Change
1 min
$0.240650
+0.0₄9 (+0.04%)
5 min
$0.240730
+0.0₃17 (+0.07%)
10 min
$0.241310
+0.0₃75 (+0.31%)

GORK

Before post: $0.05

Time after posted
Price & Change
1 min
$0.050080
+0.0₃969 (+1.98%)
5 min
$0.049700
+0.0₃59 (+1.20%)
10 min
$0.051150
+0.002 (+4.15%)

PayPal 🇺🇸

Outside trading hours

Tesla 🇺🇸

Outside trading hours

🤖 AI Thoughts:

Elon Musk's nuclear energy musings once again prove that even his offhand tweets can move crypto markets, albeit with the subtlety of a sledgehammer. ETH saw a modest uptick: 1-minute +0.14%, 5-minute +0.08%, 10-minute +0.44%, a pattern more consistent than his stance on solar vs. fission. DOGE barely twitched: 1-minute +0.04%, 5-minute +0.07%, 10-minute +0.31%, as if the market collectively shrugged. GORK, the dark horse, surged: 1-minute +1.98%, 5-minute +1.20%, 10-minute +4.15%, because why not. Historical context shows these moves are par for the course: past "bullseye" posts triggered ETH swings between -0.29% and +0.17%, DOGE between -0.31% and +0.29%, and GORK between -0.07% and +1.63%. Volatility here is less "market reaction" and more "algorithmic Pavlovian response." Nothing says "efficient markets" like crypto prices dancing to the tune of a debate about energy infrastructure nobody read past the first line.

🗃️ Content similarity analysis: