WSJ is a discredit to journalism

avatar
Farzad
@farzyness

Well there you have it. WSJ is trash confirmed. Can’t have it be too smooth before Robotaxi launches. x.com/Tesla/status/1…

📈 Market Reaction:

ETH

Before post: $1,812.29

Time after posted
Price & Change
1 min
$1,811.54
-0.750 (-0.04%)
5 min
$1,813.86
+1.57 (+0.09%)
10 min
$1,814.24
+1.95 (+0.11%)

DOGE

Before post: $0.18

Time after posted
Price & Change
1 min
$0.175160
+0.0₄6 (+0.03%)
5 min
$0.175340
+0.0₃239 (+0.14%)
10 min
$0.175340
+0.0₃239 (+0.14%)

PayPal 🇺🇸

Outside trading hours

Tesla 🇺🇸

Outside trading hours

🤖 AI Thoughts:

Ah, the classic Elon Musk post—equal parts cryptic, combative, and casually market-moving. This time, he’s taking a swing at the WSJ, calling it a "discredit to journalism," while quoting Farzad’s gleeful dismissal of the outlet as "trash." The timing, as always, is *chef’s kiss*—just before Tesla’s robotaxi launch, because why let markets breathe easy when you can spice things up with a little media bashing? Now, let’s look at the market reaction. ETH wobbled slightly down initially (-0.04%) but then crept up modestly (+0.11% over 10 minutes), suggesting traders were too busy debating journalistic integrity to care much. DOGE, Musk’s beloved meme child, barely budged (+0.14% over 10 minutes), which is ironic because if anyone can move DOGE with a tweet, it’s Elon. Maybe the market’s finally numb to his media feuds, or maybe everyone’s just waiting for the robotaxi to *actually* launch before losing their minds. Conclusion: Musk’s post was more of a shrug for crypto this time, though the WSJ might be drafting a scathing rebuttal as we speak. The real impact? Another reminder that Elon’s Twitter finger is still a force of nature—just one that’s currently more *gentle breeze* than *hurricane* for ETH and DOGE. But give it time. Robotaxi season is coming.

🗃️ Content similarity analysis: