No matter what deal I make with respect to Russia/Ukraine, no matter how good it is, even if it’s the greatest deal ever made, The Failing New York Times will speak BADLY of it. Liddle’ Peter Baker, the very biased and untalented writer for The Times, followed his Editor’s demands and wrote that Ukraine should get back territory, including, I suppose, Crimea, and other ridiculous requests, in order to stop the killing that is worse than anything since World War II. Why doesn’t this lightweight reporter say that it was Obama who made it possible for Russia to steal Crimea from Ukraine without even a shot being fired. It was also Liddle’ Peter who wrote an absolutely fawning, yet terribly written Biography, on Obama. It was a JOKE! Did Baker ever criticize the Obama Crimea Giveaway? NO, not once, only TRUMP, and I’ve had nothing to do with this stupid war, other than early on, when I gave Ukraine Javelins, and Obama gave them sheets. This is Sleepy Joe Biden’s War, not mine. It was a loser from day one, and should have never happened, and wouldn’t have happened if I were President at the time. I’m just trying to clean up the mess that was left to me by Obama and Biden, and what a mess it is. With all of that being said, there was no reason for Putin to be shooting missiles into civilian areas, cities and towns, over the last few days. It makes me think that maybe he doesn’t want to stop the war, he’s just tapping me along, and has to be dealt with differently, through “Banking” or “Secondary Sanctions?” Too many people are dying!!!
📈 Market Reaction:
BTC
Before post: $94,031.01
ETH
Before post: $1,787.51
TRUMP
Before post: $14.92
SP500 🇺🇸
Outside trading hoursDow Jones 🇺🇸
Outside trading hoursCSI300 🇨🇳
Outside trading hoursSTOXX50 🇪🇺
Outside trading hours🤖 AI Thoughts:
Donald Trump's post, which blends criticism of the media, Obama, Biden, and Putin while hinting at potential sanctions, had a mixed and muted impact on the markets. Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH) saw minor initial gains (0.08% and 0.12% in the first minute, respectively) before dipping slightly negative after 10 minutes (-0.14% and -0.28%). This suggests crypto traders briefly reacted to the geopolitical noise but quickly shrugged it off—perhaps because Trump’s rant was more about blame-shifting than actionable policy. Meanwhile, the TRUMP token (likely a meme coin tied to his brand) dipped more sharply (-1.61% over 10 minutes), as if the market collectively sighed at another round of political theatrics. The post’s tone—combative, nostalgic for his own presidency, and light on concrete details—likely left traders unimpressed. Crypto markets often thrive on volatility, but Trump’s words here were more of a damp squib than a catalyst. The fleeting gains in BTC and ETH could reflect a knee-jerk reaction to his mention of banking sanctions (which might theoretically boost crypto demand), but the lack of sustained momentum hints that traders saw little substance behind the bluster. As for the TRUMP token’s decline, maybe even his most loyal hodlers are getting fatigued by the drama. In short: Trump’s post moved markets about as much as a pebble in a hurricane—briefly noticeable, then swiftly forgotten. The real takeaway? When the former president talks geopolitics, crypto traders seem to prefer tuning out.