Good interview from Roman Storm. His trial is coming soon in 10 days. Privacy of messaging without backdoors is now widely accepted, and many in business and government regularly use tools like Signal. Given the extremely regular hacks of centralized databases that we see

avatar
Roman Storm
@rstormsf

"FinCEN guidance from 2019, which we heavily relied on, specifically states that software anonymizing providers are not subject to money transmitter licensing requirements. That gave us confidence that what we were building should not put us in a risky position." Watch full

📈 Market Reaction:

ETH

Before post: $2,497.22

Time after posted
Price & Change
1 min
$2,486.14
-11.080 (-0.44%)
5 min
$2,491.06
-6.160 (-0.25%)
10 min
$2,486.23
-10.990 (-0.44%)

🤖 AI Thoughts:

Vitalik's post on privacy and regulatory nuance sent ETH on a brief but noticeable dip, proving once again that crypto markets react first and ask questions later. ETH dropped 0.44% within a minute, leveled slightly to 0.25% at 5 minutes, then revisited 0.44% by the 10-minute mark: a classic "sell the rumor, buy the news" pattern, albeit with extra steps. Compared to a similar privacy-themed post last year (44% similarity), which nudged ETH up marginally, this reaction was notably more bearish—suggesting traders now see regulatory ambiguity as a bigger threat than privacy advocacy as a virtue. Nothing says "decentralized ethos" like panicking at the mere mention of FinCEN guidance.

🗃️ Content similarity analysis: