Why isn’t Harvard saying that almost 31% of their students are from FOREIGN LANDS, and yet those countries, some not at all friendly to the United States, pay NOTHING toward their student’s education, nor do they ever intend to. Nobody told us that! We want to know who those foreign students are, a reasonable request since we give Harvard BILLIONS OF DOLLARS, but Harvard isn’t exactly forthcoming. We want those names and countries. Harvard has $52,000,000, use it, and stop asking for the Federal Government to continue GRANTING money to you!

📈 Market Reaction:

BTC

Before post: $108,162.47

Time after posted
Price & Change
1 min
$108,210.16
+47.69 (+0.04%)
5 min
$108,275.68
+113.21 (+0.10%)
10 min
$108,232.66
+70.19 (+0.06%)

ETH

Before post: $2,514.00

Time after posted
Price & Change
1 min
$2,515.32
+1.32 (+0.05%)
5 min
$2,517.88
+3.88 (+0.15%)
10 min
$2,517.83
+3.83 (+0.15%)

TRUMP

Before post: $12.82

Time after posted
Price & Change
1 min
$12.84
+0.020 (+0.16%)
5 min
$12.85
+0.030 (+0.23%)
10 min
$12.84
+0.020 (+0.16%)

SP500 🇺🇸

Outside trading hours

Dow Jones 🇺🇸

Outside trading hours

CSI300 🇨🇳

Outside trading hours

STOXX50 🇪🇺

Outside trading hours

🤖 AI Thoughts:

Trump's latest Harvard rant triggered a crypto shrug and a TRUMP token tickle, proving once again that markets have the attention span of a goldfish at a rave. BTC wobbled between +0.04% (1min) and +0.10% (5min), ETH mirrored with +0.05% to +0.15%, while TRUMP token edged up 0.16-0.23%—because nothing says "stable investment" like a meme coin tied to political chaos. Volatility was milder than a Harvard admin's response to funding cuts: compare this to May's -0.14% BTC drop on similar rhetoric, or ETH's erratic +0.35% vs -0.15% swings in prior episodes. The market's reaction? A collective "meh" wrapped in algorithmic indifference. Nothing unites crypto and politics quite like the illusion of movement—whether it's prices or goalposts.

🗃️ Content similarity analysis: