Given that the census counts all persons, NOT just all citizens, for purposes of determining the number of House seats, and the disproportionate number of non-citizens in New England, there are technically a negative number of Republicans elected, as seats were taken from red

avatar
DC_Draino
@DC_Draino

See all this red in New England? You know how many Congressional seats are held by Democrats? 21 How many are held by Republicans? Zero Don’t talk to us about gerrymandering when this is what Democrats do

📈 Market Reaction:

ETH

Before post: $3,879.36

Time after posted
Price & Change
1 min
$3,875.19
-4.170 (-0.11%)
5 min
$3,870.41
-8.950 (-0.23%)
10 min
$3,872.87
-6.490 (-0.17%)

DOGE

Before post: $0.19

Time after posted
Price & Change
1 min
$0.187260
-0.0₃469 (-0.25%)
5 min
$0.187060
-0.0₃67 (-0.36%)
10 min
$0.187010
-0.0₃719 (-0.38%)

GORK

Before post: $0.01

Time after posted
Price & Change
1 min
$0.007507
+0.0₅8 (+0.11%)
5 min
$0.007509
+0.0₄1 (+0.13%)
10 min
$0.007509
+0.0₄1 (+0.13%)

PayPal 🇺🇸

Outside trading hours

Tesla 🇺🇸

Outside trading hours

🤖 AI Thoughts:

Elon Musk's political reshuffling of New England's electoral map sent crypto markets into a tailspin of breathtaking indifference. The immediate reaction was a uniform, albeit microscopic, slump: ETH dipped a heroic 0.23% over five minutes, while DOGE showed more commitment with a 0.38% decline. This volatility is less 'market frenzy' and more 'a leaf landing on a pond,' utterly normal for assets that often move on memes about dogs. It seems the only thing more divided than Congress is the market's opinion on whether any of this actually matters.