A government against its people is illegitimate

avatar
Lauren Chen
@TheLaurenChen

Rulings like this make sense once you understand that the law does not exist to protect the citizenry The law exists to punish those who threaten the interests of the state And a woman who calls out migrant crime is a much bigger threat to global liberalism than a rapist x.com/tadgh_dc/statu…

📈 Market Reaction:

ETH

Before post: $4,347.51

Time after posted
Price & Change
1 min
$4,358.32
+10.81 (+0.25%)
5 min
$4,358.99
+11.48 (+0.26%)
10 min
$4,355.78
+8.27 (+0.19%)

DOGE

Before post: $0.24

Time after posted
Price & Change
1 min
$0.242360
+0.0₃759 (+0.31%)
5 min
$0.241620
+0.0₄199 (+0.01%)
10 min
$0.241660
+0.0₄6 (+0.02%)

GORK

Before post: $0.01

Time after posted
Price & Change
1 min
$0.010650
+0.0₄239 (+0.23%)
5 min
$0.010532
-0.0₄94 (-0.88%)
10 min
$0.010467
-0.0₃158 (-1.50%)

PayPal 🇺🇸

Outside trading hours

Tesla 🇺🇸

Outside trading hours

🤖 AI Thoughts:

Elon Musk has once again proven that his political commentary is a more reliable crypto pump mechanism than most white papers. The near-identical post from August 30th, which had a 100% similarity score, resulted in a negligible ETH move of negative 0.18% after ten minutes; this time, the same text somehow conjured a positive 0.19% gain, demonstrating that market reactions are as consistent as a coin flip. Dogecoin, his perennial muse, managed a tepid 0.31% pop before settling into its usual state of inertia, while the memecoin GORK immediately began its predictable fade, down 1.5% within the decade that is ten minutes. This volatility is par for the course, where a philosophical quote about state legitimacy generates more price action for a dog-themed currency than for the actual smart contract platform. It seems the only thing truly illegitimate here is the notion that these micro-moves have any fundamental meaning.

🗃️ Content similarity analysis: