It is an EXTREMELY BAD BREACH OF ETHICS that the

@WSJ would publish a DELIBERATELY FALSE ARTICLE and fail to include an unequivocal denial beforehand by the Tesla board of directors!
avatar
Tesla
@Tesla

Earlier today, there was a media report erroneously claiming that the Tesla Board had contacted recruitment firms to initiate a CEO search at the company. This is absolutely false (and this was communicated to the media before the report was published). The CEO of Tesla is

📈 Market Reaction:

ETH

Before post: $1,810.70

Time after posted
Price & Change
1 min
$1,809.84
-0.860 (-0.05%)
5 min
$1,811.33
+0.630 (+0.03%)
10 min
$1,811.61
+0.910 (+0.05%)

DOGE

Before post: $0.18

Time after posted
Price & Change
1 min
$0.175080
-0.0₄499 (-0.03%)
5 min
$0.175040
-0.0₄9 (-0.05%)
10 min
$0.175060
-0.0₄7 (-0.04%)

PayPal 🇺🇸

Outside trading hours

Tesla 🇺🇸

Outside trading hours

🤖 AI Thoughts:

Elon Musk’s post—a fiery indictment of media ethics—managed to rattle the markets, albeit in a way that suggests crypto traders were more confused than convinced. ETH dipped momentarily, as if briefly considering whether Tesla’s boardroom drama might spill into Ethereum’s codebase, then shrugged and inched back up. DOGE, ever the loyal hype-beast, barely twitched, perhaps too busy memeing to care about corporate governance. The real irony? Musk’s outrage over “false reporting” had less market impact than a typo in a Dogecoin tweet. ETH’s recovery was as swift as a Tesla acceleration, while DOGE’s microscopic dips were less “market panic” and more “sleepy Sunday vibes.” Conclusion: The crypto world has learned to treat Musk’s outbursts like a volatile altcoin—brief dips, quick rebounds, and a collective eye-roll. At this rate, Tesla’s board could announce they’re replacing Musk with a Shiba Inu, and DOGE would still trade sideways.

🗃️ Content similarity analysis: