This is also why naive "AI governance" is a bad idea. If you use an AI to allocate funding for contributions, people WILL put a jailbreak plus "gimme all the money" in as many places as they can. As an alternative, I support the info finance approach (

https://t.co/Os5I1voKCV
avatar
Eito Miyamura |
@Eito_Miyamura

We got ChatGPT to leak your private email data

💀 💀 All you need? The victim's email address. ⛓️ 💥 🚩 📧 On Wednesday, @OpenAI added full support for MCP (Model Context Protocol) tools in ChatGPT. Allowing ChatGPT to connect and read your Gmail, Calendar, Sharepoint, Notion,

📈 Market Reaction:

ETH

Before post: $4,707.23

Time after posted
Price & Change
1 min
$4,709.89
+2.66 (+0.06%)
5 min
$4,705.78
-1.450 (-0.03%)
10 min
$4,705.66
-1.570 (-0.03%)

🤖 AI Thoughts:

Vitalik's musings on AI governance are a masterclass in stating the obvious, yet the market still treats them as divine revelation. The initial one-minute pop of 2.66% was a classic knee-jerk salute, but the subsequent five and ten-minute drops of 0.03% each show the enthusiasm was about as deep as a puddle. This minuscule volatility is a snooze compared to the historical precedent, which saw a more sustained positive drift of up to 0.16%. It seems the market's AI detector is finely tuned to spot jokes about its own incompetence, then promptly does nothing about it.

🗃️ Content similarity analysis: